Last week, Right Wing News published results of an informal poll showing John McCain ranking high on conservative bloggers' hit list.
Glenn Beck said he might have voted for Hillary Clinton if she'd been McCain's foe:
"McCain is this weird progressive like Theodore Roosevelt was."
But a very cursory glance at voting records will show McCain's one of the strongest conservatives in the Senate, and a more substantive one will corroborate that.
Here's something that's kind of both.
Last week the Club for Growth flagged a new report on who's voted for the first 5 budget-busting appropriations bills this year.
Republicans on the list.
Lamar Alexander -- TN
Robert F. Bennett -- UT
Thad Cochran -- MS
Susan Collins -- ME
Orrin G. Hatch -- UT
Kay Bailey Hutchison -- TX
Mike Johanns -- NE
Richard G. Lugar -- IN
Lisa Murkowski -- AK
Richard C. Shelby -- AL
Olympia J. Snowe -- ME
George V. Voinovich -- OH
Roger Wicker -- MS
Republicans voting against all five budget-busters:
Tom Coburn -- OK
Jim DeMint -- SC
John Ensign -- NV
John McCain -- AZ
Now comes word that the Senate's rejected John McCain's effort to divert $2.5 million for new C-17 cargo jets into military readiness accounts.
In case you're wondering why the U.S. needs 10 new cargo jets, so is the Pentagon, which says it has enough.
Let's take a look at roll call.
Those voting "yes" wanted to divert the money; those voting "no" wanted 10 more C-17 cargo jets at a cost of $2.5 billion.
Key names voting "yes":
a. Nevada Sen. John Ensign YES
b. Tennessee Sen. Bob Corker YES
c. Arizona Sen. Jon Kyl YES
d. South Dakota Sen. John Thune YES
e. And of course, it's McCain's amendment, so McCain "yes".
Some key names who want 10 new C-17 Cargo Jets:
a. Texas Sen. John Cornyn
b. SC Sen. Jim DeMint
c. Utah Senators Orrin Hatch and Bob Bennett
d. California Senators Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein
e. The entire Senate Democratic leadership.
Result: The amendment was defeated 64-34.
Let's see if this makes Glenn Beck's show tomorrow -- the fact that $2.5 billion will be spent for cargo jets the Pentagon says we don't need.
Beck could draw a plane figure with cute wings on the blackboard.
In a way, this vote is a kind of F-22 redux, wherein John McCain led opposition to a military spending project that many conservatives said was waste.
The F-22 was a perfect opportunity to score political points on the GOP's best brand -- the military and national security -- but McCain stood against exploiting the issue for political currency.
Numerous Republicans weren't of the same persuasion, including SD Sen. John Thune, Georgia Senator Saxby Chambliss, and Louisiana Sen. David Vitter, to name just a few.
And in in her Hong Kong speech, Sarah Palin added her voice of dissent to the F-22 decision, which stood in marked contrast with her image as a pork-buster, but would make her a welcome companion of Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein, who voted to continue F-22 funding.
Yet the cosmetics of "conservatism" right now rest on whichever is the easiest crutch, just as the cosmetics of liberalism did during the Bush years.
The Left's crutch was "blood for oil".
The Right sees blood, too, but it's from "a bleeding heart that doesn't want to protect America".
And so cargo jets turn into the political balloon (10 of them, at a cost of $2.5 billion).
Barack Obama supported McCain's amendment -- let's see if he's willing to buck his party's leadership and veto money for 10 new cargo jets (at a cost of $2.5 billion).
[Hat tip: Senatus]


























