Mike Allen and Jim Vandehei:
Top Republicans in Washington and in the national GOP establishment say the 2010 campaign highlighted an urgent task that they will begin in earnest as soon as the elections are over: Stop Sarah Palin.
Interviews with advisers to the main 2012 presidential contenders and with other veteran Republican operatives make clear they see themselves on a common, if uncoordinated, mission of halting the momentum and credibility Palin gained with conservative activists by plunging so aggressively into this year’s midterm campaigns.
There is rising expectation among GOP elites that Palin will probably run for president in 2012 and could win the Republican nomination, a prospect many of them regard as a disaster in waiting.
Many of these establishment figures argue in not-for-attribution comments that Palin’s nomination would ensure President Barack Obama’s reelection, as the deficiencies that marked her 2008 debut as a vice presidential nominee — an intensely polarizing political style and often halting and superficial answers when pressed on policy — have shown little sign of abating in the past two years.
"There is a determined, focused establishment effort … to find a candidate we can coalesce around who can beat Sarah Palin," said one prominent and longtime Washington Republican. "We believe she could get the nomination, but Barack Obama would crush her."
This sentiment was a nearly constant refrain in POLITICO interviews with top advisers to the candidates most frequently mentioned as running in 2012 and a diverse assortment of other top GOP officials.
Nearly all of these interviewees insisted on keeping their views on background, fearing the wrath of conservative grass-roots activists who are enthralled with the former Alaska governor and who have made plain that the establishment’s disdain for Palin and her devotees is mutually reciprocated.
Top Republicans, from presidential hopefuls Mitt Romney and Tim Pawlenty to highly influential advisers such as Karl Rove and Ed Gillespie, are said to be concerned she will run, and could win, according to the officials.
If they're really serious about stopping her, at some point, names besides Karl Rove are going to have to come out and face the wrath of Palin fans.
My guess is that
Ann Coulter, who's
already urged Palin not to run and seems to be an undeclared backer of Mitt Romney, will step up the hits.
Two other names to watch --
Charles Krauthammer and
Fred Barnes, who both have impeccable conservative credentials and have been pretty critical of her.
Krauthammer called Palin's endorsement of O'Donnell "destructive and capricious", and you wonder whether he views her mercurial temperament somewhat similarly.
Last year,
he accused her of "whining."
"I don't think it's productive for her to attack the media. A) it's not going to change anything. Secondly, her coverage is the oxygen she lives on. She'll be covered all the time as no one else has.
.... And thirdly, when she complains about it, it has a whining quality like Nixon in '62, in which he said to the media 'you're not going to have Dick Nixon to kick around anymore.' She doesn't need that.
And soon after Palin resigned as governor of Alaska,
Fred Barnes lit into her (despite his colleague, Bill Kristol's admiration).
"Forget about Sarah Palin as the Republican presidential candidate in 2012 and probably ever.... Palin is no Reagan. He was governor of California for two terms, before which he'd been an effective leader in the fight against Communists in the movie industry.
Every bit as important, Reagan had read the works of all the great conservative thinkers of the past two centuries. He had imbibed their wisdom."
Barnes has also hit Palin for her tendency to, as he put it last year, "whine."
"There is a way to deal with the press. Look at the way Ronald Reagan did. He didn't attack the press. He teased them. He made fun of them. He jokes about them, embarrassed them. It was great.
People loved it and it didn't have that edge, that whiny edge that you always want to avoid."
Also, Palin's rivals for the '12 nomination are going to have to start questioning her. They can't hide their names behind articles like this one.
If Palin can somehow manage to make her name synonymous with conservatism, that's going to spell trouble for her opponents in the primary.
But still, in order to actually win her nomination, she's still going to have to make some overtures to the establishment, because right now she runs the risk of becoming what novelist
John Cheever described himself as:
“I am the sort of iconoclast who will ridicule the establishment endlessly and expect to be seated at the head of the table.”
That's a tough balancing act, but one she's obviously managing, or else articles like Allen and Vandehei's wouldn't be written.